In early February, OCLC invited interested staff members of libraries to join in a Local Holdings Users Group virtual meeting, where OCLC staff presented topics related to Local Holdings Maintenance to those of us who do the work and often don't get the opportunity to participate in the semi-annual ALA meetings.
It was great idea, as one can tell from the overwhelming response: staff from over 400 libraries tried to participate in the virtual meeting. Unfortunately, it was literally overwhelming; the group exceeded the audio system's capacity and - as some of you already know - many libraries who had registered were unable to connect to the audio portion of the meeting. MINITEX was among those who could not get connected, so I know first-hand how frustrating it was to have access to a silent slide show.
But that's not the end of the story.
To begin with, OCLC is going to repeat the meeting and create an archived version, so those who didn't get to experience the meeting will have another chance to participate fully. (Note: Invitations for the repeat session will be limited to those who registered for the first meeting, but the archived version will be available for everyone's review.) That's good news, and we'll certainly let folks know when the new session gets scheduled.
But beyond that, we have the ability to share our ideas, questions and answers right here! And we are really encouraging you to join in. These blogs can be more than just another venue for MULS to announce workshops or pass on notes to staff at our participating libraries. They can be a forum where you can participate in discussions of ideas and issues that effect us all.
There's a lot going on right now in the world of Local Holdings, and we'd love to hear your perspective. Consider responding to one or more of the following questions:
1) Did you get into the Local Holdings user group webinar on 2/7? What did you find out?
2) Were (or are) there questions you were hoping to have answered by the LHR user group webinar? What questions do you have that were not addressed?
3) Was there information that will change the way you do your work, or that helped you see new ways your Local Holdings Records can be useful either to your library internally or to other libraries?
4) Did the information about batchloading change your ideas about it? Is your library wanting to make use of batchloading to update holdings in OCLC? What obstacles have to be overcome for that to happen?
And, of course, if there's a topic you'd like to discuss or a question you need answered, you certainly are encouraged to share it.
Thanks for sharing your ideas and questions!