3 speakers:
Matthew Bejune, Purdue University Libraries
url: LibraryWikis
-examples of library wikis are here
-librarians are encouraged to contribute library wikis they know of that aren’t listed here (password: LWcontrib)
Meredith Farkas, Queen of Wikis, maintains Library Success: A Best Practices Wiki, blogs at Information Wants to be Free
url: meredithfarkas.wetpaint.com - presentation slides and resources can be found here
Tim Spalding web developer and publisher, founder of LibraryThing
This conversation about this presentation will continue at the Talking Reference &… - RUSA blog - look under the category of Social Networking
Matthew B.:
Libraries & Wikis
Collected examples – 35 total – research from 1-2 yrs ago – many more blogs since then
Identified 4 types of library wikis:
1.) Collaboration between libraries – 45.7%
-ex. ALA wiki where librarians from anywhere can contribute
2.) Collaboration between staff – 31.4%
-internal communications
3.) Collaboration between library staff & patrons – 14.3%
-ex. St. Joseph County PL
4.) Collaboration between patrons – 8.6%
Questions to ponder (he doesn’t have the answers):
-where are the wikis used in categories 3 & 4?
-how might we allow users to build/modify library info? – control factor – open the door to let patrons add info/contribute
-in what ways will libraries next utilize wikis & other social networking technologies?
-how long before your library implements some form of a wiki?
Meredith F:
She’s all about Knowledge Management (KM)
-all orgs. Want to make the best use of institutional knowledge
-all libs. Have different areas of interest & expertise
-our patrons have lots of knowledge that would be useful to other patrons
-we usually are pretty terrible at collecting this knowledge
Info Sharing is great but how do we capture/keep all that info?
-one-on-one conversations
-staff meetings
-IM, Twitter, etc…
-scraps of paper at the ref. desk
-email
-blogs
Blogs are great – for short term info
How are we collecting out knowledge for the long term?
ex. Aadl.org (get link)
-allowing patrons to tag things in the catalog
-“users who checked out this book also checked out” – taken straight from amazon – don’t be afraid of this – technology is good enough to strip away private info so we can capture and use this info – don’t have to hide this
ex. HCL’s bookspage (get link)
-best reader’s advisory site (in the whole wide world!)
-letting our user’s doing their reader’s advisory for us
-allowing comments in the catalog and is being heavily used
ex. RocWiki (get link) Rochester Wiki
-guide to Rochester community – anyone can contribute
-people can ask questions and other members answer
-very similar to a community board
-good ex. For a library to base off of – team up w community
ex. BizWiki (get link)
-guides to different types of research
-grt site because of the collaborative nature – having faculty and students add to the resources
-search option
-assign catefories to each page to make it easier to browse
ex. PennTags (get link)
-social bookmarking site for campus community
-create tags
-organize your own research
-see what others have done
-results show up in catalog
-letting your users do your work for you (in a sense – we get to learn from them too!)
Wiki as Intranet
-share procedures & policies
-share basic info
-share knowledge about ref. resources – assignments students are coming to desk about – ref. sources in subject expertise (that you may have little knowledge of)
*it can take time to build KM behavior into the organizational workflow
-takes formal training
-working it into the daily workflow
Tim S:
Founder of LibraryThing
-it’s like MySpace for books & book lovers
-sharing books w people and groups
-connected to people thru this site
-get to use high quality metadata and tags
-they call it “social cataloging” (room laughs)
-knowledge is a conversation – don’t just say what you know – how to thesis
-libraries very much like the web
-catalog as conversation
-users add info/images/pieces to pages in LT
isbnThing – connecting isbn’s, relating books and editions and formats
“it shouldn’t work, like wikipedia shouldn’t work but it does” – people keep it going
-chick lit tag used as an ex. – not in LCSH (later corrected by someone in the audience that it was added to LCSH in 2006 – he points back that LCSH doesn’t back add so a lot of the books, the critical books that made that term, are not even associated with it)
-people use cooking as a tag, LCSH uses cookery
-cyberpunk – related to… subjects – tag neuromancer – largest tag cyberpunk has, this is what it means to people
book: Tales of the city
-compares the LC online catalog to the LT tags
-tags get at the identity and what it means – LCSH can’t do this
Problems of tagging:
-too many for one book – ex. Diary of Anne Frank – some tags: historyish, in Belgium
-bad tags wash out statistically – not used by that many people
-complexity/hierarchy better in LCSH that’s harder to get in tags
ex. Leather – mismatch of tag meanings
-problems w who’s makikng tags up
New/Coming to LT:
TagMash
-combining tags together
ex. France, wwii, non-fiction
ex. Magic, -fiction (minus fiction)
ex. Chick lit, Greece
LT starting to offer in library catalogs – read more at librarything.com/forlibraries
-works in any opac
-brings up things only in that libs. Catalog
LT doesn’t handle non-book formats very well but they’re working on this.