November 2009 Archives

The country debates over sending more troops to Afghanistan

The New York Times reported Tuesday that President Obama may send 30,000 American troops to Afghanistan, but the final number will be announced Tuesday next week.

 

Obama said his approach to the war will be different from the previous administration's methods, although the goals of containing Al-Qaeda will be similar.

 

There has been heated discussion at the White House between Obama and his top aides, according to an administration official who said "there was a lot of back and forth" at a two-hour meeting earlier this week.

 

Even Nancy Pelosi, the House speaker, said there was "serious unrest in our caucus about can we afford this war."

 

"The American people believe that if something is in our national security interest, we have to be able to afford it," she said.

According to a Wednesday Associated Press report, polls show Americans' support for the war has dropped significantly and most say the war is not worth fighting anymore.

In a Wednesday commentary for The Progressive, Matthew Rothschild said that "it would take at least ten times [the number of troops proposed] to have a decent chance of vanquishing the Taliban ... [it is] an enormous cost in U.S. and Afghan lives, and in U.S. tax dollars."

Calling Obama's choice a "muddle path," Rothschild added that only more civilian and U.S. soldier deaths would result "with no end in sight."

However, press secretary Robert Gibbs said Wednesday that the troops will focus on securing areas taken from the Taliban so that U.S. forces can leave soon, according to the AP.

"We are not going to be there another eight or nine years," he said.

 

Links:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/25/us/politics/25policy.html

 

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iqyaFh_efr-brDq0rMLF1hkop0tgD9C6NH9G0

 

http://www.progressive.org/wx112509.html

Healthcare cuts hurt hospitals statewide

There have been rising concerns across Minnesota over a wave of budget cuts in the state's health care system, according to a Star Tribune report.

 

Hospitals, including Hennepin County Medical Center and Regions Hospital, and clinics have had to cut positions and reduce services because of the statewide budget cuts.

Advocacy groups have voiced major concerns over cuts on HCMC's budget in particular. The hospital lost $12 million last year in Gov. Tim Pawlenty's unallotment process, this year it cut 200 positions, and it will cut another $43 million soon.

This would "tip this hospital over and create a crisis," said Dr. Joseph Clinton, chief of emergency medicine in the Star Tribune report. "It would mean unacceptable deaths for patients who can't get care."

Pawlenty spokesman Brian McClung said Thursday that the decisions were difficult "but they were necessary in order to balance the state budget during a time of unprecedented economic challenges."

The governor also plans to eliminate General Assistance Medical Care (GAMC), which would significantly reduce the health care coverage of those with chronic illnesses and mental health problems.

Minnesota Public Radio reported that the Minnesota Department of Human Services outlined a proposal to transfer 28,000 people from GAMC into MinnesotaCare, but many, like Hennepin County Chairman Mike Opat, say the plan will not work because MinnesotaCare caps payments and is less generous than GAMC.

Democratic state lawmakers have been developing a plan to help the sickest GAMC patients despite the budget cuts; details of the plan will be out in a few weeks, according to MPR.

Links:

http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2009/11/18/hcmc-to-adopt-2010-budget-deep-cuts-expected/

 http://www.startribune.com/local/70712002.html?page=2&c=y

 

Debate over Israel's settlement freeze

Al Jazeera English reported Wednesday that Israel's prime minister announced a 10-month suspension to the construction of new settlement houses in the West Bank.

 

Benjamin Netanyahu's announcement came at a press conference Wednesday, during which he said the decision was made to encourage the peace process with the Palestinians.

 

Calling the move "far-reaching and painful," according to a Haaretz report, Netanyahu said construction would resume after the moratorium is over.

 

Despite the announcement, another Haaretz report said many Palestinian leaders are dissatisfied with the proposal because of its failure to halt construction in Jerusalem, where Palestinians hope to establish a state capital in the future.

 

According to Al Jazeera, Israel's proposal excludes public buildings and the construction of 3,000 buildings that has already begun.


"This is not a moratorium," said chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat. "Unfortunately, we hoped he would commit to a real settlement freeze so we can resume negotiations and he had a choice between settlements and peace and he chose settlements."

 

Netanyahu's announcement comes after pressure from the Obama administration to freeze settlements. Although the U.S. president has not made comments on the move yet, U.S. reactions have been mixed. Middle East envoy George Mitchell said the move was disappointing because it is not a full freeze on construction, but he acknowledged its significance and potential positive impact, according to the BBC.

 

Links:

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2009/11/2009112517021318173.html

 

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1130636.html

 

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1130646.html

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8379868.stm


About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from November 2009 listed from newest to oldest.

December 2009 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.