Don't take Freud too literally

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes


Freud.jpg

Despite being discounted by modern science for it's subjectivity, lack of replicability and emphasis on sexuality, the work of Sigmund Freud has been influential both within and outside of the field of psychology. In fact, even less accepted theories (like the Oedipal Complex) are still major points of discussion in looking at literature. The idea of the Unconscious has even been used to question the validity of scientific empiricism itself. I am taking a class where the reading material is based heavily on these assumptions and am curious about how many of Freud's ideas are still thought to be of value in modern practice. Further, our textbook establishes that claims are falsifiable or metaphysical, how are claims which question this binary itself classified? Does Freud's lack of applicability in his own field make the continued use of it by other disciplines a poor choice?

This is the trailer for the mediocre movie about Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud I saw this weekend. It (like psychoanalysis) may focus a bit too much on sex.


1 TrackBack

www.clarisonicofficial.ca from www.clarisonicofficial.ca on February 7, 2013 4:27 AM

Don't take Freud too literally - Psy 1001 section 22 Spring 2012 Read More

1 Comment

| Leave a comment

I thought that the movie trailer was eye catching but that the article was very vauge. I would have liked it if you would have talked more about Freud's ideas before asking so many questions. It got me kind of confused.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by thibo026 published on January 29, 2012 10:48 PM.

One a day... keeps fat away? was the previous entry in this blog.

Smiles around the World is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.