This article by Jody Raynsford from the Online Journalism News Web site provides an insight into what journalists and others really think of blogging as a form of journalism. Some agreed that it can be considered journalism because alot of blogging is based on fact and fact checking is very possible. They also agreed because it provides insight to some news events and an "additional layer of information" for readers.
One of the most popular forms of blogging is citizen journalism, where people can get the most up-to-date "news" about the Iraq war and other events. Here is an excerpt about citizen journalism from the article:
"Readers are flocking to online news sites by the millions for the latest news about the war in Iraq," JD Lasica, senior editor of the Online Journalism Review, told dotJournalism. "But the story doesn't end there.
"They are also streaming to weblogs for sceptical analysis, critical commentary, alternative perspectives rarely seen in mainstream media, [such as] the views of foreigners, and the occasional first-person account. A handful of reporters in the Gulf region are maintaining weblogs to provide fuller, more personal and colourful reporting of what they are witnessing first-hand."
Many argue that those involved with the media should jump on the bandwagon of blogging, due to its newness and becoming evermore popular.
"If the news media chooses to ignore it, it'll continue to lose a chance to connect with readers on an intimate daily basis. And they'll become a bit less relevant with each passing day," said Lasica.
However, many others think that blogging is just blogging and cannot be considered journalism. They argued that it lacks the real hard news and mixes in too much of the writer's personality and personal views to be considered factual.
The article can be found at: http://www.journalism.co.uk/features/story604.html