wynga002: May 2012 Archives

In the past few years, a new light has been shed on the Nature Vs. Nurture debate, the discovery of Epigenetics. The idea behind Epigenetics is "the expression of any one gene is embedded within a biological system influenced by a multitude of other genetic and environmental influences." Basically, instead of focusing on Nature or Nurture separately; these two ideas are being seen as combined and correlate to each other. An example of Epigenetics is someone that is born with a high level of intelligence (Nature) but not given the ample attention and educational resources (Nurture) needed to reach their full academic potential. Therefore instead of arguing which is more prominent, psychologists and scientists have mostly agreed that there is a very delicate balance between Nature and Nurture. I find this new information very interesting and agree with the idea behind Epigenetics. There is almost never only one answer in psychology, there are many factors that influence people and it's important that each factor is considered in order to obtain the best results.

Although very much off topic (because I need to cover two discussion sections), I am going to discuss what a supertaster is and list criteria for everyone to see if you have this amazing trait. Everybody tastes things differently, this is due to the number of taste buds each person contains on their tongue. The more taste buds a person has, the more intensely they perceive tastes, especially bitter ones. If you're A. Female and B. from Asia, Africa, or South America, you have a better chance of being a supertaster. Do you not like fruits and vegetables? Flavanoids that are found in these foods taste unpleasantly bitter to supertasters so they tend to shy away from them. Lastly, if you tend to stay away from super fatty, sugary, and salty foods; it could be a sign you're a supertaster. After looking at these traits, I am not a supertaster. Are you?

Something that we learned this semester in Psychology 1001 that will stick with me for a long time is the personality section. It was not only interesting to learn about, but completely true. I especially enjoyed the vacation activity we were given in our discussion and how we were separated by our personality types. It was really funny and interesting to see how the different groups planned their vacations and how they presented them to the class. I noticed right away when my group started speaking that we were the high extraversion and low conscientiousness group. Then when we had to present it to the class we all started talking loudly and were excited and added humor into the whole trip. The other groups were funny to watch because they were more quiet and carefully planned. I've always known I have a more outgoing and loud personality but it was most interesting to me to see the others that were classified in my personality group and see the people that didn't fit in mine. Overall, I will remember that discussion and activity for a very long time. It was fun, interesting, and really showed how everyone is different in so many ways.

About this Archive

This page is an archive of recent entries written by wynga002 in May 2012.

wynga002: April 2012 is the previous archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.