In the United Kingdom, a manifesto from the Community Foundation Network has called for the teaching of charity in schools to achieve "a long term shift in the culture of philanthropy in the UK." This means that an organization of community groups is calling on the national government to get involved in promoting charitable behavior in children in the public schools.
It got me thinking: Could this happen in the United States?
In one sense, it is, in that President Obama has made a call to Americans to serve our communities, but that's a general "be a good citizen" type of thing, and by no means is it a lesson plan, heaven forbid. We saw how well that went over when the president just wanted to say "Welcome back!" to our nation's schoolchildren.
On serve.gov, there is a link that includes ideas for starting a service project, and the education components are "read to kids," and "start a bookdrive." Both good ideas, but hardly earth-shattering curricular innovations.
I poked around online a bit, to look into this idea of children and philanthropy. I found a bookmark to an article I read back in July. I thought it was great, but I was not sure to do with it. An 11-year-old boy walked 59 days and 668 miles to bring attention to the cause of homelessness. He said it was tiring, but "then I thought about the kids who do not get to quit being homeless." The Philanthropy Project, an organization devoted to enhancing citizen philanthropy, followed Mr. Bonner and plans to make a movie about him.
If this were my kid, I would be so smug with pride that I would be unbearable. My kid is 16 months old, and his charitable acts are sharing raspberries (that I picked) and small chunks of cheese (that I cut). He is also willing to show me his toys and even let me hold them for short periods of time.
But I would like him to grow up with a sense of social justice and civic responsibility, and charity is a first step down that road.
How do we teach charity and philanthropy to kids? Can it be taught at all? Is this even a subject for the public schools? Many would argue that only religious schools can approach such topics, insisting that they are grounded in morality and therefore are the purview of religious traditions, and that public institutions should not be pushing morality.
I disagree.
I think that learning to be a good citizen is smack dab in the center of public education, and morality and ethics are human traits. Indeed, Thomas Jefferson's ideas on public education form much of the basis for the beginning of our system here in the United States, and the Common School movement of the 19th century believed that public education could create a united, moral citizenry, helping to prevent crime and poverty. (It was greatly due to this movement that a free elementary education became available to all American children regardless of wealth or religion.)
One need not talk about religion to teach civic responsibility and charity. In public schools, the Socratic method can be used in many different subjects to begin talking about what it means to be a "good citizen," and there are often ways to localize even the broadest topics. Of course, each teacher, knowing his or her students and their general demographics, will best know how to approach the subject, bearing in mind that some students may already be recipients of charity.
I would be pleased if my child were being taught about charity school, not only when it is understood as "generosity and helpfulness," but in a broader sense, of "benevolent goodwill toward or love of humanity." We are already working on it, trying to teach about sharing and getting him to stop hitting the cat.
The sharing bit may prove easier to tackle.
Comments
A family member of mine who works in the development field told me that he assumes that people are philanthropic--that they are naturally inclined to generosity. In this way, I think, he frees himself from having to "sell" charity as a concept so that he can move straight to explaining the importance of the programming.
Perhaps the educational efforts you hope for could be built upon the same assumption?
Posted by: Bjorn | September 24, 2009 11:45 AM
Following on your comment that the teacher should "bear in mind that some students may already be recipients of charity," I think it's important to remember and recognize that we all are capable of giving and receiving "charity," no matter our socio-economic or cultural backgrounds. This concept of service by and for all is a fundamental tenet of the programs of the federal Corporation for National and Community Service (e.g., AmeriCorps and VISTA).
Also, for anyone who studies fundraising statistics, it's interesting to note that individuals from lower income households tend to give a higher percentage than those at middle income levels. Something for us all to think about.
Posted by: Wendy Wehr | September 25, 2009 3:11 PM
I loved your article- from the inspiring example of the long walk by an 11 yr old, to the candor about your little one hitting the cat.
It's also true that our 19th century model of education included an understanding of basic morals that enrich a society, making it work for all its people, not just some.
I suppose it's up to parents to do the greatest share of teaching in this regard, and perhaps example and experience is the best way to have an impact in that way.
So far as unique examples of charity and benevolence that are working, and growing, there are ever so few organizations that are designed to go beyond the "donate" model, and actually provide a path to grow a livelihood by doing good in the world. I've looked into such models, and this one is the best I've found.
http://child-sponsoring-home-biz.com
Posted by: Tim | January 16, 2010 2:48 PM