Cason, T. and L. Gangadharan. 2005. A laboratory comparison of uniform and discriminative price auctions for reducing non-point source pollution. Land Economics 81(1): 51-70. Keywords: 2a, 8e, 8g
Recently in e. Local or national level regulations (Endangered Species Act, zoning) Category
Cason, T., L. Gangadharan and C. Duke. 2003. A laboratory study of auctions for reducing non-point source pollution. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46: 446-71. Keywords: 2a, 8e
A market solution for preserving the black rhinoceros. In Endangered Species Protection in the United States: Biological Needs, Political Realities, Economic Choices
Brown, G.M., Jr. and D. Layton. 2001. A market solution for preserving the black rhinoceros. In Endangered Species Protection in the United States: Biological Needs, Political Realities, Economic Choices, J. Shogren and J. Tschirhart (eds.), pp 32-50. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Keywords: 4t, 8e, 8f, 10
Cason, T. and L. Gangadharan. 2004. Auction design for voluntary conservation programs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(5): 1211-1217.
Keywords: 8e, 8g
McKee, M. and R.P. Berrens. 2001. Balancing army and endangered species concerns: green vs. green. Environmental Management 27(1): 123-133.
Keywords: 8e, 8g
Metrick, A. and M. Weitzman. 1998. Conflicts and choices in biodiversity preservation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12(3): 21-34. Keywords: 4x, 8e
Cost-effectiveness analysis for complex managed hydrosystems: An application to the Columbia River Basin
Paulsen, C.M. and K. Wernstedt. 1995. Cost-effectiveness analysis for complex managed hydrosystems: An application to the Columbia River Basin. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28: 388-400. Keywords: 6b, 8e
Bernow, S., R. Costanza, H. Daly, R. DeGennaro, D. Erlandson, D. Ferris, P. Hawken, J. A. Horner, J. Lancelot, T. Marx, D. Norland, I. Peters, D. Roodman, C. Schneider, P. Shyamsundar and J. Woodwell. 1998. Ecological tax reform. BioScience 48: 193-196.
Feather, P., D. Hellerstein and L. Hansen. 1999. Economic Valuation of Environmental
Benefits and the Targeting of Conservation Programs: The Case of the CRP. Economic
Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Keywords: 3c, 8e
Brown, G.M., Jr. and J.F. Shogren. 1998. Economics of the Endangered Species Act. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12(3): 3-20. Keywords:8e
Ready, R. C. and R.C. Bishop. 1991. Endangered species and the safe minimum standard. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(2): 309-312. Keywords: 8e
Global variation in terrestrial conservation costs, conservation benefits, and unmet conservation needs
Balmford, A., K. Gaston, S. Blyth, A. James and V. Kapos. 2003. Global variation in terrestrial conservation costs, conservation benefits, and unmet conservation needs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 1046-1050. Keywords: 6e, 8e
Barbier, E.B. 2002. Institutional constraints and deforestation: an application to Mexico. Economic Inquiry 40(3): 508-519. Keywords: 5a, 6c, 8e, 10
Balmford, A., K.J. Gaston, A.S.L. Rodrigues and A. James. 2000. Integrating conservation costs into international priority setting. Conservation Biology 11: 597-605.
Keywords: 6e, 8e
NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. 1993. Natural Resource Damage Assessment under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990. Federal Register 58(10): 4601-4614.
Opportunity costs of preserving coastal wetlands: A case study of a recreational housing development
Batie, S.S., and C.C. Mabbs-Zeno. 1985. Opportunity costs of preserving coastal wetlands: A case study of a recreational housing development. Land Economics 60(1):1-9. Keywords: 5c, 6a, 8e
Lueck, D. and J.A. Michael. 2003. Preemptive habitat destruction under the Endangered Species Act. Journal of Law and Economics 46: 27-60. Keywords: 8e
National Research Council (NRC). 1995. Science and the Endangered Species Act. Washington DC: National Academy Press. Keywords: 8e
US Environmental Protection Agency. 1997. The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act, 1970 to 1990. Washington, DC: EPA. Keywords: 8e
Young, C.E. and C.T. Osborn. 1990. The Conservation Reserve Program: An Economic Assessment. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service,
Washington, DC. Keywords: 8e
Balmford, A. and W. Bond. 2005. Trends in the state of nature and their implications for human well-being. Ecology Letters 8: 1218-1234. Keywords: 3b, 4x, 8e
Carson, R.T., L. Wilks and D. Imber. 1994. Valuing the preservation of Australia's Kakadu Conservation Zone. Oxford Economic Papers 46: 727-749. Keywords: 6a, 7g, 8e, 10
Smith R.W.B. and J.F. Shogren. 2002. Voluntary incentive design for endangered species protection. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43(2): 169-187.
Ribaudo, M.O. 1989. Water quality benefits from the conservation reserve program. Agricultural Economics, Report No. 606. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Keywords: 4b, 4g, 8e
Polasky, S. and H. Doremus. 1998. When the truth hurts: endangered species policy on private land with imperfect information. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 35(1): 22-47. Keywords: 8e