Recently in If you want to read more... Category

glee and the disabled

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Have y'all seen Glee? 
Regardless, the show this week is about living life in a wheelchair (and other disabilities): 


I won't discuss my views on the episode--I wouldn't want to set the tone/mood. But the show is always fun to watch and ripe with things to discuss post-viewing. 
I instantly thought of Jess and Michelle's activity when I saw this. 
Enjoy!

Mel
I just added a few more items to our extra readings folder on WebCT:

a. Chandra Talpade Mohanty. "On Race and Voice: Challenges for Liberal Education in the 1990s."
b. Mary Bryson/Suzanne de Castell. "Queer Pedagogy: Practice Makes Im/Perfect."
c. Emi Koyama, Dr. Lisa Weasal, ISNA. "Teaching Intersex Issues: A Guide for Teachers in Women's, Gender, and Queer Studies."
d. Tre Wentling, Elroi Windsor, Kristen Schilt, Betsy Lucal. "Teaching Transgender."
e. Kathryn Conrad and Julie Crawford. "Passing/Out: The Politics of Disclosure in Queer-Positive Pedagogy."
f. Meyer, Elizabeth J. "But I'm Not Gay: What Straight Teachers Need to Know about Queer Theory."

Please let me know if there any sources that you would like me to add to our extra readings folder. Also, if there are any topics in feminist pedagogy that you want to more about, post a request here on the blog. Happy reading!


Are you interested in using video blogs in your pedagogy? Here is an example from Jay Smooth at ill doctrine entitled "How to tell people they sound racist." What do you think? How might we put his strategies into conversation with Berlak and Erickson? 

One more thing...I have added a category called "syllabus reflections." Make sure to check the box for this category when you are writing your syllabus reflection entries. Also, remember to check the box for the category pedagogical question when you are writing your official pedagogical question entries. 

Video: Blue Eyes/Brown Eyes

| 1 Comment | No TrackBacks
In case you have never seen Jane Elliott's exercise and are interested:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6189991712636113875&ei=4kvsSrq1IZOorQL2zcHIAQ&q=jane+elliott&hl=en&client=firefox-a#



Sexualities special issue on pedagogy

| 1 Comment | No TrackBacks
Some of you might be interested in the October 2009 special issue of Sexualities. Here is the table of contents:

Sexualities Special issue: 'Researching and Teaching the Sexually Explicit: Ethics, Methodology and Pedagogy'

Edited by Feona Attwood and I.Q. Hunter

Introduction:
Feona Attwood & I.Q. Hunter 'Not Safe for Work?: Teaching and Researching the Sexually Explicit'

Brian McNair 'Teaching Porn'

Clarissa Smith 'Pleasure and Distance: Exploring Sexual Cultures in the Classroom'

Susanna Paasonen 'Healthy Sex and Pop Porn: Pornography, Feminism and the
Finnish Context'

Katrien Jacobs 'Sex Scandal Science in Hong Kong'

Steve Jones & Sharif Mowlabocus 'Hard Times and Rough Rides: The Legal and Ethical Impossibilities of Researching "shock" Pornographies'

Alan McKee 'Social Scientists Don't Say "Titwank"'

Kath Albury 'Reading Porn Reparatively'

Dennis D. Waskul "My boyfriend Loves it when I Come Home from this Class":
Pedagogy, Titillation, and New Media Technologies'
I have added the article, "Coming Out Pedagogy: Risking Identity in Language and Literature Classrooms" by Brenda Jo Brueggemann and Debra A. Moddelmog to our WebCT site. I put it in the folder for week 6: 10/28. After briefly skimming it, I think it might fit nicely with our discussion of Care and Being Careful on 11/18, soI will add it to the folder for that week (week 11) as well.

I have also added a folder entitled "extra readings." These are readings that you might find helpful in your thinking about what feminist pedagogy is and how to practice it. Please email me any articles (as pdfs, if possible) that you would like me to add to the folder. Here are two articles I just added:

1. Introduction--Feminist Pedagogies in Action: Teaching beyond Disciplines
Sara L. CrawLey, Jennifer e. LewiS, MaraLee Mayberry

With these specially themed and guest-edited issues of Feminist Teacher, "Feminist Pedagogies in Action: Teaching beyond Disciplines," our intent is not only to demonstrate hands-on applications of feminist pedagogies, but also to learn from each other's interpretations of feminist pedagogical techniques across disciplines. This desire to learn from each other raises a practical question: How do we recognize a pedagogy as feminist? In other words, if feminist pedagogies are not bound to a scholarly area of study, what are the commonalities that make a pedagogy feminist? It is necessary to outline some fundamental principles of feminist pedagogy to supply a framework for our discussion.

2. Twisted Privileges: Teaching Inclusion in Feminist Teaching
Frinde Mahler

As an academic feminist, however, I focus this paper on my classroom-- specifically, on a feminist theory class I've taught over the past decade at Wheaton College, a small, coeducational, private liberal arts school in New England, whose students are primarily white and middle class. I also draw on a study of feminist pedagogies published earlier. When my co-author, Mary Kay Tetreault, and I first published The Feminist Classroom in 1994, my own classroom and those we studied for the book were all about inclusion and "voice" and giving students' experiences validity and visibility. Seismic shifts have taken place since then. To remain, or to become, a radical feminist teacher today is to be centrally concerned with unpacking complex relations of privilege and oppression, and thus fundamentally reworking the structural as well as representational terms of inclusion that feminist teaching promises.
Here are a variety of links on using technology in the classroom. I am not sure what this type of blog entry is called. Over on Alas, a blog it has been referred to as a link farm or linkspam. Regardless of what you call it, I find this type of entry to be very helpful. I have even thought about assigning it to students, as a way for them to demonstrate their blog research. Anyway, here is a mini list 'o links on technology and the feminist classroom.

1. Want to know more about how bloggers use this type of entry to present a lot of different links in a succinct and accessible way? Check out these two examples from Alas, a blog here or here.

2. Are you curious about what other feminist teachers, like this one or this one, think about technology in the classroom?

3. Facebook and Twitter assignments? Really? No, really, on twitter and facebook.

4. What does feminist pedagogy look like in an engineering classroom, with the help of wikis and blogs?

Okay, that's all I have time for now. Feel free to post your own list 'o links.  

Note: After looking over my list 'o links, I started wondering: Should I put more information about each site? Is a link enough? I am not sure how I feel about whether or not to include more information on the link, so I will leave the entry as is for now. What do you think? 

in reference to women's access online...

| 1 Comment | No TrackBacks
(i'm not due for a pedagogical question, I just wanted to share this!)

This Feministing post about the lack of women contributors on Wikipedia brought me right back to the first week's readings. This is yet another sly, almost invisible, upholding of white, male, educated privilege online. Also, the men who hold the majority of contributors are graduate students. Before I just re-post the entire article in my own words... 


I am reminded specifically of a few articles I read on Blogging Feminsim: (Web) Sites of Resistance. "Attracting Readers: Sex and Audience in the Blogosphere," "Where Are the Women...," and "Blogging Was Just the Beginning..." all argue (via examples) that women have it really tough online. We have to fight for our space, for our voices to be heard, and to please not be judged and (not be) given privilege because our level of sexiness. Add to that "Access to Technology..." and the argument that women feel uncomfortable learning new technology with men around! Well, I think we may have our answer with the Wikipedia problem. Women already have to prove themselves with a bit more vigor than men online. Add to that an already established Boys Club that rules Wikipedia...and yeah, total bummer. 

Although, I do wonder how this gender gap is unfolding. Wikipedia allows you to be pretty androgynous and mysterious with your identity (as do many facets of online networks). Is there something about the back end of Wikipedia that is intimidating? Is it something that women just aren't that interested in adding to? Or are there censors in place that allow/don't allow certain values to be perpetuated? (the post I linked to mentions discourse about violence against women being a little "sketchy on Wikipedia). 

Just some food for thought. Thanks for listening (as a reader)! 

Mel (mmm how do i want to mark myself as being different from the other Melody in class...I guess I'll go with all my tattoos. I am the Melody with the tattoos). 


Blogging: Some other sources

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Last night in class I mentioned a few articles that I assigned in my Queering Theory course. Here is what I wrote about those sources for the queering theory blog. All of the articles are available online through the U of M library.