What not to Believe you Have to Wear

Is TLC’s hit show, “What not to Wear� transforming women into an image that isn’t true to their true character? The strategy is simple: hosts Clinton and Stacy select people volunteered by their friends to receive a wardrobe and style make-over. The people shown in this program often appear to dress normal enough, but through the keen eyes of “top Hollywood fashion consultants,� these people have a terrible choice in everyday dress attire. The way someone dresses is often seen as an expression of one’s personality. When others come in and tell a person what they should and should not be wearing, I believe it forces that person to re-evaluate their themselves to bend to the will of the others, that person then becomes untrue to themselves.
From the get go, this show is full of upbeat dance music. The show rarely has any men on, I guess men have a much better fashion sense than women after all, or maybe this programis geared towards women and designed with them in mind. This show’s fashion faux pa victim is Kristy. She is described as, “A frumpy legal assistant.� So what’s Kristy’s problem? She wears too much black, her shoes are too rectangular and her glasses are too old (they’re from 2003). When we first are introduced to Kristy, we see that she is shy, quiet, and very self-conscious about her body (she is a few pound over-weight). Overall, Kristy lacks confidence in herself. Kristy (like everybody on the show) agrees to give Clinton and Stacy complete control over what she will now be wearing. What she will be wearing are likely to be styles found in the commercial advertisements that station TLC runs in the time slot. Various product placements of clothing items and other beauty products are laced throughout the show. The show airs at 12pm, 2pm, 9pm and 11pm. The show seems to jump around the "prime time" line up of shows it would have to compete with if it aired earlier in the morning or the 7 o'clock to 9 night programs. This way, theshow can catch it's main audience after Desperate House Wives and Grey's Anatomy and other shows with predominately female veiwerships.
When the show’s hosts describe Kristy, they use words such as “fun, young and vibrant.� They are giving her an identity. From observing Kristy throughout the show, it is obvious that she is not a “fun, young, and vibrant� type of person. She is actually quite conservative and honestly dull, she claims she doesn’t like to stand out and be noticed. If this how she describes herself, why do Clinton and Stacy tell her that she is the opposite of what she is? She dresses in dark, unrevealing styles because she doesn’t want to stand out, not because she doesn’t know how to dress. Something that I found completely ironic about What Not to Wear is its commercial on TLC. In the promotion for TLC and the show, host Clinton sits in front of the camera and explains to us that “we are constantly bombarded� with the thoughts, views, and opinions of others. Clinton tells us that we should be unique and be ourselves. What? If everybody should be themselves why do they need a show to tell them that they shouldn’t be dressing the way they like, rather, conform to the styles set by a changing society? The show obviously contradicts its own promotions.
When Clinton and Stacy tell Kristy what to wear, she looks down at the floor and grudgingly goes along with it. This is not Kristy’s identity. The hosts also tell her how to hide her weight through different clothing options. As Kristy tries on new clothes, the camera is quickly jumping around her body and the fabric, giving extra attention to her stomach and curves. There is a segment near the end wear Kristy (or who ever the victim may be) strike various poses as the camera pans up and down her body while her face makes us believe that she's trying to act/appear "sexy". They even go as far as to change her make-up, hair, and eyebrows, all in an attempt to make her more appealing to the values of society. This is an example of the scaling of bodies. In this theory, a common prejudice is that society only values the fit, thin and beautiful people, not the overweight and unattractive. The show is centered around the message that this make-over will change the lives of those selected for the better, bringing the person new successes. Wouldn’t it be better if the overweight (women in general) were judged more on their charisma versus their appearance.
“Acceptance will not result in healthy female bodies, though, unless accompanied by rigorous and on-going critique of women’s representation in the media.� (The Body is the Message, Cara Woods. Gender + Plus size Body).
The gaze present in this show is surely male. The camera is constantly looking up and down the body of Kristy. One could argue that this only to show off the clothing styles (which is the clear intention). The counter to this is that the camera stops and focuses close in on Kristy’s chest and hips. Objectification of the female body in Western culture produces a multitude of negative consequences for women.
“Increasingly, researchers have investigated diverse samples of women and demonstrated a variety of detrimental effects associated with self-objectification including increased body shame, appearance anxiety, disordered eating, self-surveillance, and diminished mental performance and capacity to achieve peak motivational states.� ( A Test of Objectification Theory: The Effect of the Male On Appearance Concerns in College, Rachel M. Calegero. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28 (2004).
In the end, Kristy is happy with her new look and the choices that Clinton and Stacy made for her. I still find it a little troubling that she disregarded what she was comfortable wearing to appease the opinions of those who believe they know the only acceptable way to appear in public.
Comments
People like Kristy needs to boost confidence. I think the show just helped her boost her confidence. It's not just about the looks that they are trying to change to Kristy. But the show just showed Kristy how beautiful she is.
Kristy could have just needed someone who would boost her confidence. Someone who would encourage her to believe in her own beauty.
Posted by: Boost Confidence | July 5, 2007 5:47 PM
Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! uzjaivmrxbmxtp
Posted by: wutlqdctmr | August 5, 2007 5:20 PM
Sometimes, when faced in situations like this, we can't really help feeling self-conscious. This only hinders us from communicating effectively.
We should feel more confidence when we feel self-conscious. We could communicate effectively if there is nothing whole thing feeling like that.
Posted by: Relationships | August 21, 2007 4:35 PM
Sometimes, when faced in situations like this, we can't really help feeling self-conscious. This only hinders us from communicating effectively.
We should feel more confidence when we feel self-conscious. We could communicate effectively if there is nothing whole thing feeling like that.
Posted by: Self-conscious | August 21, 2007 4:39 PM
I definitely disagree with this.
1) there's a LOT more going on behind the camera that they have to edit out. clinton and stacy spend a lot more time with the client then they let on
2) usually these women get nominated by friends or themselves, so someone in this scenario thinks that their wardrobe should change. usually for reasons like "they lost weight and don't know how to dress their new body" or "she's changing jobs and needs a whole new wardrobe for her new life" which i think are valid.
3) i couldn't find it but i remember reading an article that interviewed stacy london. in it she talks about how she uses her skills as a fashion consultant to help women with their self esteem. most often the reason for low self esteem is based on how you are percieved in the world, not how you percieve yourself. and the world we live in finds clothing and presentation to be important. by presenting yourself in a more appealing, more confident, more put together manner, the world treats you differently and you can start to think better about yourself.
4) i definitely do not think they try to change people. some people might not speak up as much about what they really want, or some people might grudgingly go along with it, which is unfortunate, but they tackle a bunch of different styles and a lot of financial allowances. They definitely form the makeover to what the person is more likely to wear and what they can afford.
Posted by: kendrah | September 20, 2007 10:20 AM
Hey i want to tell Stacy and Clinton that i love there show and that they just help a 16 year who had the passion for every since 5 to become a fashion designer even more that people won't look a H.A.M (A HOT ASS MESS) So thank you for that i love you guys and my God bless you.
P.S. Stacy my one wish is to see you shoe closet cause yo shoes be off the chin boo go head girl.
Posted by: Atim Ekpe | November 30, 2007 9:39 AM
I don't see anything wrong with helping people figure out what looks good on their particular body type, but I do see something wrong with pushing women to wear shoes that will cripple them and convincing them that they have to spend more than they can afford to clothe themselves in a way that is attractive. Also, the way Stacy London sometimes dresses (think about the red dress she wore on the episode with the "hippy dippy trippy" sisters) reminds me of my aunt when she was in her fifties. I'm in my fifties now, and I don't want to look like that. I can't imagine that young women in their twenties want to look that matronly. And do most men want to look like Cosmo Kramer? I will say that what they put the participants in looks a lot better than what they wear themselves.
Posted by: Gloriana | February 16, 2008 8:47 PM
ummm. . . no. they do not change who the person is, they change how they look. if someone wants to get far in their social and work life, they need to dress apropriately. if they want to get a job at a high end, good paying job and they come to the interview wearing a shirt that says "little devil" or "bad girl" or something stupid like that and they expect the employer to hire them to deal with people, or money, or represent them, then the person needs to be slapped for being so ignorant and ya they should change more than the way they dress. duhhhhhh! and ya they may be a little mean but in all reality, they aren't being mean at all, they are being honest. they also give these people a new confidence so they don't have to say that they dont have to say that they don't care what people say but instead be complimented by what they have to say. also, the people that are on the show agree to be on it so if it "makes them feel soooo bad" they don't have to be on it. i agree and back up this show 110%. i watch this show because i like to make fun of the retards on it but it is still a great show that builds people's confidence and it also teaches people at home if they want to change their style if it sucks butt. so ya. whoever disagrees is a complete retard because there is nothing wrong with it.
Posted by: Lisa | April 20, 2008 7:12 PM