IAT Sheds Light on the Impact of Implicit Thought...Jenny Kinzler

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes

voting-booth-6a00e54fa1b0a188340133f379ed6b970b.jpgSo I took the 2012 Implicit Associations Test and was quite surprised by the results!

In this task, I was asked to categorize "good" words, such as successful and wonderful, with white faces compared to "good" words with black faces as fast as I could. Afterwards I was asked to categorize presidential candidates with good words as fast as I could. The faster I categorized good words with one presidential candidate compared to the other candidate determined my implicit preference for that candidate. The same concept was measured when comparing white and black faces with good words: The faster I categorized good words with one racial group compared to the other exposed my hidden preference for that group.

The results of my test suggested that I had a MODERATE implicit preference for white people compared to black people and a SLIGHT implicit preference for Newt Gingrich compared to Mitt Romney.

I thought these results made sense for the most part. I wasn't surprised that I showed a higher preference toward Newt Gingrich due to his Republican affiliation; however, my white racial preference caught me off guard. Although I do not consider myself racist, I'll admit to stereotyping racial groups by using the shortcut way of thinking--the availability heuristic. The IAT revealed my subconscious racial predispositions and allowed me the opportunity to self-reflect on these test findings.

I think this test is very informative and sheds much light on the role racial attitudes and party affiliation plays on voting preferences. Although we may be unaware of some of our feelings, the IAT successfully exposes the impact implicit thinking has on our judgment, perception and action and also provides participants the opportunity for self-reflection on their individual results.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/186757

3 Comments

| Leave a comment

Thanks for the great post! I actually did a similar REP study, where I was asked to math up 'good' words and 'bad' words to either a heterosexual category or a homophobic category. I did not find out the results of this activity, but I know it was a way of measuring my views on sexual preference, again by utilizing my unconscious predisposition in order to avoid obvious bias. I'm curious as to what my results would show, because I am completely unaware of any bias/prejudice that I hold to other sexual orientations compared to my own, but it is definitely interesting to find out what our 'true' subconscious attitudes are!

This is a very interesting post. Many people have the halo effect when it comes to their racial stereotypes. The IAT is a great illustration to us that we are not all as perfect as we think we are. There is a very long process that humanity needs to go through before we all fully believe that we are equal. Things like IAT can help speed up that process by making us aware of our stereotypes and letting us suppress them.

I also took an IAT test like the one you mentioned concerning racism. Like you, I was also showed a slight preference towards white people. I thought you did a good idea of explaining the very prevalent and subconscious stereotyping in our society. This shows that although our society claims to be less racist, aversive racism still exists it is out of our conscious control. Like we learned in lecture, we need to try to shield children from these prejudices at a young age to keep them being able to resort to the availability heuristic of the stereotypes of society.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by kinzl015 published on April 22, 2012 9:33 PM.

You Look So Good in Those Genes was the previous entry in this blog.

"Just trying to fit in..." is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.