The
safety of electronics cigarettes has sparked a huge controversy with both sides

gathering steam for what may be the fight of the century. On one side, are the proponents of the ecig who rave about its
health benefits and safety compared to tobacco cigarettes. On the other is the government agency the
FDA who will be regulating it as either a tobacco product or a nicotine delivery device.
Long time users of electronic cigarettes say they are better than tobacco for numerous reasons including the
health benefits, cost savings, convenience and safety. Experts from their camp say the ecig a better alternative to tobacco as users inhale only water vapor and minute amounts of nicotine and propylene glycol all of which are considered safe. When compared to the
4000 chemicals (43 of which are known carcinogens) inhaled while smoking a normal cigarette, this does indeed sound like an alternative to be considered.
There are also the savings earned with the electronic cigarette. Estimates vary but a conservative savings of 50% is considered accurate. This would mean
$1000 per year savings could be enjoyed by a pack a day smoker. If you smoke 2 packs a day, the savings would double that, 3 packs triple and so on.
Next consider the safety and convenience of this product. The ecig does not ignite or give of ashes & smoke so there would be no accidental fire issues (smoking in bed etc.). The absence of combustion also
allows the device to be used in places considered "Smoke Free" such as restaurants and nightclubs.
On the other side of the argument is the FDA. On July 22 of this year President Obama signed into law the
Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control
Act of 2009 allowing the FDA to regulate tobacco products. Before this, there was no regulation of the tobacco industry.
Now the key word here is
REGULATE. The FDA, under this act, could not ban tobacco products but could regulate their contents, make public their ingredients, demand larger warning labels and prohibit or control advertising campaigns.
The stumbling block for the government is
whether to consider the electronic cigarette a tobacco product or a nicotine delivery device. The FDA regulates medications and medication delivery devices. So if the ecig is determined to be a nicotine delivery device, it will fall under the stringent controls used to regulate the medication industry. If it is determined to be a tobacco product, it will be controlled uner the "Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act".
It appears the electronic cigarette industry has a lot of work to due. For them to succeed,
they must convince authorities that the ecig is a tobacco product and it should be regulated as such. If it is deemed a nicotine delivery device, it will most certainly be banned as it is highly unlikey that is can be presented as a medication delivery device.