Meeting about SIETAR conference presentation
11/7/04
overarching issues:
How to meet the needs of our participants
“So what” question
Fitting the process we are working with in the larger picture
we need to simplify rather than elaborating the entire process from start-to-finish
Our program description (proposal) identifies:
Intercultural impact at many levels on many people
Expand policy process
Define policy
Focus on impact
Need articles list for participants to follow-up to get more information
Outline
1. Introduction (5 minutes)
Presenter #1: Holly
Topic (overview of purpose/content/goals)
Presenter #2: Inquire about audience members’ contexts
Presenter #3
Presenter #4: Karen
2. Policy cycle (from Bryson)
-- analyzing the alternatives
-- examples of “policy” in different contexts
Policy process steps (10 minutes)
3. Advocacy (10 minutes)
definition
relevance – need to advocate to budget planners
“so what” – include all in the problem formulation, and frame it such that those who have power can be engaged in carrying through
Internationalizing the U of M School of Education example
Interaction segment (10 minutes):
3 discussion sub-groups (each group writes on flip chart)
What is the intercultural issue?
What are the stakeholders? [Can include people in support of your issues, or people in opposition to your issue.] Where are they in the power/interest grid?
What are your challenges with that audience/context?
4. Contexts (20 minutes – 6 ½ min each)
Laurene – language teaching/learning
Chris – community agency
Holly – national policy setting
Tie in to internationalization
5. Taking it back home . . . What are your first steps? (10 minutes)
Review the policy process
Identify available resources
Analyzing the alternatives
Envisioning the future
-- relate back to each context (in rote, including Laurene, Chris, and Holly)
6. Questions? (10 minutes)
Discussion:
Depth versus breadth
Constructing the map in summary (refer to the article)
Interpreting the map – how to use it for advocacy purposes
The purpose of showing the other contexts is to demonstrate for the audience contexts relevant to them.
The alternative context presentations
List of stakeholders
-- Relative power and interest
-- how to infer the significance of these connections
-- how to do the advocacy process for these other contexts
Handout to include:
PowerPoint of presentation (3 to a page, with notes lines)
Scenarios and blank maps on backs
Blank map
Bibliography
Deadline for our sections:
Thursday 11/11 or 11/12
Meeting with Holly and Laurene about SIETAR
11/5/04
overarching issues:
How to meet the needs of our participants
“So what” question
Fitting the process we are working with in the larger picture
we need to simplify rather than elaborating the entire process from start-to-finish
Our program description (proposal) identifies:
Intercultural impact at many levels on many people
Expand policy process
Define policy
Focus on impact
Need articles list for participants to follow-up to get more information
Outline
1. Introduction (5 minutes)
Presenters
Topic (overview of purpose/content/goals)
2. Policy cycle (from Dunn?)
-- analyzing the alternatives
Policy process steps (10 minutes)
3. Advocacy (10 minutes)
definition
relevance
“so what”
Interaction segment (10 minutes):
3 discussion sub-groups (each group writes on flip chart)
What is the intercultural issue?
What are the stakeholders?
What are your challenges with that audience/context?
4. Contexts (20 minutes – 6 ½ min each)
Laurene – language teaching/learning
Chris – community agency
Holly – national policy setting
Tie in to internationalization
5. Taking it back home . . . What are your first steps? (10 minutes)
Review the policy process
Identify available resources
Analyzing the alternatives
Envisioning the future
-- relate back to each context (in rote, including Laurene, Chris, and Holly)
6. Questions? (10 minutes)