<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>stationary</title>
      <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/scha1028/architecture/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:21:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.25</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
	
         <title>Opponents</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Opposition Type</strong>:  PERMANENCE & ENTROPY<br />
"Time/timelessness in physical realm"</p>

<p>Why do we need leaders?  Because without them we're doomed to <u>Lord of the Flies</u>.  The elections last 7 November 2006, whether you liked the results or not, occurred as a result of this opposition, of permanence and entropy, of forever and destruction.  My first oppostition is of this form, or more appropriately, of man and himself.  We lead eachother because without direction we feel lost.  Politicians exist based on the premise that they are the solution to this opposition- they're here (in theory) to lead us, to "protect" our country and make it's decisions for us so we don't have to.<br />
__Politicians actually breed more oppositions- between man and himself- when they act against their voters wishes and when thier decisions cause the lives of their constituents to be disrupted.</p>

<p><strong>Opposition Type</strong>:  Man & Nature/ Permanence & Entropy</p>

<p>The "question" is no longer a question:   we're using the last of our finite resources in these coming years, and there has to be a change for the continuation of human existence.  The solutions:  sustainable design, forward thinking architecture, renewable resources, energy conservation, waste reduction, and putting our waste to work for us by powering homes.</p>

<p><strong>Opposition Type</strong>:  Mass & Form  </p>

<p>SPACE: there's less of it.  PEOPLE: there's more of them.  Problem?  Yes.  Solution:  Build up, not out, and more efficiently.  FLW's Mile High Tower was the extreme of this solution, allowing more green space and less city clutter.  Soleri's Acropolis was another, and leCorbusier's Northern Paris rennovation was a loos interpretation.</p>

<p><strong>Opposition Type</strong>:  Mass & Form</p>

<p>Traffic is one of life's horrendous oppositions.  City, country or suburb, it plagues the population no matter where they are.  Solution:  London had it right- close off the city to all traffic but buses and taxis.  Cars should not be allowed in the downtown area.  Trains, buses and taxis are cheaper and friendlier to the environment.  It wouldn't eliminate the problem, but it would help.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/scha1028/architecture/2006/11/opponents.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/scha1028/architecture/2006/11/opponents.html</guid>
         <category>people//politics</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:21:33 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
	<enclosure url="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/scha1028/architecture/american%20wasteland.jpg" length="22371" type="image/jpeg" />
         <title>American Wasteland</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>We drive to work to make money, so that we can put gas in our cars, pay the insurance on them, and fix them when they break... Given, yes, this is an overgeneralization, but even still the idea is realized.</p>

<p>AUTOMOBILES~~~ America's Passtime.  The world's own cultural phenomena...</p>

<p>Circa 1905-- Henry T. Ford's factories begin mass-producing the Model T.  Thirty years later, every American family has one; they aid in the facilitating the development of a large middle-class.</p>

<p>Our American Wasteland<br />
<img alt="american wasteland.jpg" src="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/scha1028/architecture/american%20wasteland.jpg" width="457" height="650" /><br />
Source: http://www.rareads.com/scans1/26431.jpg</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/scha1028/architecture/2006/10/american_wasteland.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/scha1028/architecture/2006/10/american_wasteland.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:28:09 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
	
         <title>..Here in my Room</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Genius Loci~ as I understood it, it is the location of the genius of space, which can be described according to Christian Norberg-Schulz and Roman concept as what a thing is, or wants to be..</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/scha1028/architecture/2006/10/here_in_my_room.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/scha1028/architecture/2006/10/here_in_my_room.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:56:31 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
	<enclosure url="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/scha1028/architecture/htdocs/blog/scha1028/architecture/Lo-Landfill.jpg" length="478006" type="image/jpeg" />
         <title>&quot;Knock &apos;em Down, Make &apos;em Bigger&quot;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Wasted Space.  It's everywhere- look around wherever you are right this instant and you will find it, provided you're not in student housing.  </p>

<p>Wasted Resources.  Take a look at your garbage can.  What's in there?  Could you have reused any of it?  Did you really need to have it in the first place? </p>

<p>Sustainability.  Expensive; necessary.  The only way to look at future architecture.  </p>

<p>DON'T knock 'em down, then- fix 'em up; DON'T make 'em bigger, make them better, more efficient...</p>

<p><img alt="Lo-Landfill.jpg" src="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/scha1028/architecture/htdocs/blog/scha1028/architecture/Lo-Landfill.jpg" width="709" height="709" /><br />
Picture courtesy of: http://www.hpsupplies.info/images/Lo-Landfill.jpg</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/scha1028/architecture/2006/09/knock_em_down_make_em_bigger.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/scha1028/architecture/2006/09/knock_em_down_make_em_bigger.html</guid>
         <category>ENERGY</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:21:39 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
	
         <title>Midtown Xchange</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The neighborhood in which the former Sears distribution center downtown sits is one in disrepair, to put it lightly.  </p>

<p>The building itself has been refurbished, though, now boasting clients such as Allina Health Care on top of the Midtown Market.  The ceilings are open and large pillars are a staple in the entry across from the new parking auxiliary ramp that costs only $.75 for one hour of parking.  I did not feel like I was in a bad part of town- the building is inviting, and as an architecture student interested in sustainability and using what we already have, I loved the fact that it was a rennovation rather than a demolition-rebuild project.</p>

<p>The flow of people within the market was constant, despite the fact that it wasn't very crowded.  Energy is brought through the front doors and to the left, where the market begins.  I'd say there is no other place I've seen that combines so many different cultures in one space.  Specific shops emit unique heritage, which creates a flow about the large room and seems to move with the consumer, browsing shop to shop.  Perhaps the greatest force is felt from the eateries, where Swedish, Mexican and Russian delicacies can all be tasted. </p>

<p>Overall the energy is positive.  It's a wonderful place, one of the largest succesful rennovations completed in the U.S., finishing only two years ago.  Over ten years the giant of a building sat dormant until finally, the funding and ambition were mustered to start and finish the monster project from 2000-2004.  The history and former glory of this antique building are qualities that add to it's energy, and highlight an effort by the city of Minneapolis to re-enlighten it's former glories.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/scha1028/architecture/2006/09/midtown_xchange.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/scha1028/architecture/2006/09/midtown_xchange.html</guid>
         <category>ENERGY</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:26:21 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
