American medicine's infatuation with screening tests - even sometimes in defiance of the evidence on harms and benefits - creates a crusading environment in which "Screen...screen...screen...earlier...earlier...earlier" is the mantra.
Now, the Wall Street Journal Health Blog reports the latest on the rush to market an ovarian cancer test. Excerpts:
"The FDA has warned clinical-test giant LabCorp that it has been marketing an ovarian cancer test (OvaSure) without approval, vindicating skeptics of the assay who worried it wasn’t ready for prime time.Posted by schwitz at October 9, 2008 08:45 AM | TrackBack
…
Researchers around the world have been racing to develop a test that will detect ovarian cancer early, because it usually isn’t found until it has already spread outside the ovaries, when it is very often fatal.
…
Some cancer specialists fear OvaSure could yield too many false positives — causing women to undergo unnecessary exploratory surgery or to have their ovaries removed as a precaution — and false negatives, reassuring them when they might still be at risk.“When you make a test available, then people are likely to make decisions based on the test,” said Rebecca Sutphen, a spokeswoman for the National Ovarian Cancer Coalition and director of genetic counseling and testing services at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute in Tampa, Fla. “Obviously, everyone is on the same page in terms of wanting such a test. But women may be using this information prematurely to make decisions, and the decisions may not be in their best interests.”
The Society for Gynecologic Oncologists also issued a statement in July saying additional research was required before OvaSure was offered to women outside of research settings."
This particular issue is timely to me as I am composing a Graduate Leadership and Policy project paper, citing the work of Dr.Slamon at UCLA (and the HER2/neu gene) leading to development of herceptin. There are several parallels as herceptin was made widely available before trials were complete (due to trends observed by the (dsmb?). My post is more of a question than a comment as policy is very new to me (with a solid background in science). Where can I find additional literature on issues relating to gene-related disease discoveries, genetic testing and healthcare policy in the US? Any guidance is very much appreciated. Thank you in advance for your accessibility and your assistance.
Posted by: Jenn Speicher at October 9, 2008 01:06 PMJenn - Pubmed is the best place to go for actual scientific literature and studies. Depending on your search terms you will be able to find anything and everything that has been published in medical and policy journals.
Posted by: Scott at October 10, 2008 08:33 AMMy policy on comments
I'm adopting the policy of a blog I admire: “Comments are great;
obnoxious comments get deleted. Deal.? I also won’t post profanity, product pitches, or anything from anyone
who doesn’t list what appears to be an actual e-mail address.