Ghostwriting in medical journals

| No Comments

The Wall Street Journal today has an excellent, although troubling look at ghostwriting. That is, researchers who do the work don't actually write the research results in papers submitted to journals.

Sometimes the "ghostwriting" is not disclosed. Oftentimes the ghostwriter is hired by a drug company whose product is the subject of the research.

One journal editor tells the story of a paper that was submitted but the "track changes" function of Word was still in place. It showed that the "author" really didn't write the article. And a telltale note was in the text: "Marketing approval required."

This is an ethical issue that journals and the scientific community must deal with.

Leave a comment

My policy on comments

I'm adopting the policy of a blog I admire: “Comments are great; obnoxious comments get deleted. Deal." I also won’t post profanity, product pitches, or anything from anyone who doesn’t list what appears to be an actual e-mail address.


About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Gary Schwitzer published on December 13, 2005 10:38 AM.

Cleveland Clinic's stunning conflict of interest story was the previous entry in this blog.

Hyped "improvement" of PSA test is no solution is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Archives

Pages

Wikio - Top of the Blogs - Health

Add to Technorati Favorites