Stop calling it the best health care system in the world

| 2 Comments

Dr. Zeke Emanuel, a bioethicist at the National Institutes of Health, published a rant on the U.S. health care system in the Journal of the American Medical Association this week.

Emmanuel wrote:

"Many no longer believe the United States has the best health care system in the world. The statistics are damning. The United States has the most expensive system, by far. In 2005 health care cost more than $6000 per person or in excess of 16% of the gross domestic product (GDP). The nearest rival, Switzerland, spends $4077 per person per year, or 11.5% of its GDP (in purchasing power parity). Norway spends $3966 (9.7% of GDP); Germany, $3043 (10.6% of GDP); and South Korea, a mere $1149 (8.2% of GDP). However, Americans are increasingly aware that all of this money is not buying very much. Life expectancy in the United States is 78 years, ranking 45th in the world, well behind Switzerland, Norway, Germany, and even Greece, Bosnia, and Jordan. The US infant mortality rate is 6.37 per 1000 live births, higher than almost all other developed countries, as well as Cuba. Even for white individuals, the numbers are not world class—5.7 infant deaths per 1000 live births—more than double the rate in Singapore, Sweden, and Japan. Even at the individual hospital level, Americans are realizing the care they receive is not of the highest quality. The idea put forth in the Institute of Medicine report To Err Is Human that 100 000 Americans die each year from medication errors in the hospital has taken hold in the public consciousness as emblematic of the problems with the quality of health care.

Furthermore, Americans are becoming aware that in such an unreliable system even money cannot guarantee outstanding care.

...Increasingly, Americans are beginning to be skeptical about whether new health care technologies are better. The tipping point probably came with the withdrawal of rofecoxib from the US market. Today, the list of drugs and technologies for which new might not be better (and may be even worse) has expanded rapidly: postmenopausal hormone therapy, bare-metal stents, megadose antioxidants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for adolescents, Swan-Ganz catheters, gabapentin for bipolar disorder, erythropoietin for anemia, and the list goes on."

2 Comments

I'm not quite sure why you labelled this article a rant. I've posted more extensive extracts on my blog.

Mr. Bonzo

"Rant" was not the best term for me to choose. It can be viewed as a pejorative term, and I did not mean to color the term in that way in this use.

Leave a comment

My policy on comments

I'm adopting the policy of a blog I admire: “Comments are great; obnoxious comments get deleted. Deal." I also won’t post profanity, product pitches, or anything from anyone who doesn’t list what appears to be an actual e-mail address.


About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Gary Schwitzer published on May 18, 2007 3:52 PM.

Should women be downing statins? Online debate. was the previous entry in this blog.

No surprise: Americans confused about cancer is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Archives

Pages

Wikio - Top of the Blogs - Health

Add to Technorati Favorites