Times story ticks off doc

A physician in NY wrote to me today about an article in the New York Times, "After a Stroke, Freeing Muscles With Botox."

The physician wrote because he felt the article didn't explain the exact indications for the approach described in the story, didn't discuss the evidence, and didn't quantify the alleged benefits. He wrote:

I highlight this because I run into this problem all the time and I could see a run on, "doc, I need this."

He's right: none of that information is in the story.

But here is what IS in the story: a projection from one true believer-physician that "only about 5 percent of the stroke patients who could benefit from its use ever get it." The story goes on to disclose that that doc "gets financing from three botulinum toxin producers."


About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Gary Schwitzer published on March 17, 2009 7:07 AM.

DCIS and primum non nocere was the previous entry in this blog.

Here come the lobbyists - a hint of what health care reform faces is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



Wikio - Top of the Blogs - Health

Add to Technorati Favorites