I had an interesting discussion today in one my sections. Several students brought up the oft-quoted "Ignorance is bliss" issue when it comes to the food they consume. Basically, that if it tastes good, they won't worry about it. As one students said, "What I don't know doesn't hurt me." (Though in the case of E. Coli contamination, that's not exactly true.)
I pressed them on this a bit. Specifically, I brought up the division in capitalist societies between producers and consumers, and how that gap often allows for abuse to occur. With food, that might mean working conditions in slaughterhouses or animal cruelty issues.
The responses students gave to this point were interesting. One said that it was just these people's roles and that's how life is. Basically, that there will always be the oppressed among us, and we should just accept the system. Another brought up a variation on that, that immigrants (using that slaughterhouse issue) will always be oppressed. A third student asked, "But are you saying we're to blame for that?"
In a word, yes. What amazed me about the discussion was the lack of empathy students felt for those working at the other end of the food chain. What mattered to them was convenience, cost, and flavor, not bigger ethical issues. It makes me wonder if this is how an economic system like ours sustains itself, by reducing producers and consumers to abstract ideas, not flesh and blood people like us. To a certain extent, this might be a defense mechanism, since so often we feel quite powerless to change the system--we have neither the time, money, or opportunity to do so. Yet to defer blame for this is disingenuous. We feed this system with our money--if we chose to buy more expensive, yet ethical products, the system itself would change. But without real connection, a sense that we are all in this together in some way, and the time and resources to care, it's a tough road.