<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>jen&apos;s media journal</title>
      <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/smit4082/genderstudies/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:06:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.25</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
	<enclosure url="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/smit4082/genderstudies/whitersmilegetsnoticed.jpg" length="100803" type="image/jpeg" />
         <title>Womanizing Advertisements Not Just In the Fashion Industry</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I think that most people, at one point in their lives or another, find<br />
certain magazine ads to be sexist, violent, extreme, and uncalled for. When<br />
people think of these types of images, either â€śclothingâ€? or â€śperfumeâ€? or<br />
â€śalcoholâ€? ads come to mind, but how often do you think of an ad for chewing<br />
gum or any other little daily luxuries?</p>

<p>I saw this ad and for a few seconds, without seeing the bottom 1/6 of the<br />
page, had no idea what it was trying to sell. Hmm..a vectored, cartoonish<br />
image of a skinny blonde either clasping or unclasping her bra strap,<br />
pictured from behind, standing in front of an open windowâ€¦To say the least,<br />
it did not exactly catch my attention. Then I see a small image of a pack<br />
of Trident gum next to the text, â€śA whiter smile gets you noticed. Even if<br />
you donâ€™t want to be.â€?</p>

<p><img alt="whitersmilegetsnoticed.jpg" src="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/smit4082/genderstudies/whitersmilegetsnoticed.jpg" width="419" height="540" /></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/smit4082/genderstudies/2007/04/womanizing_advertisements_not.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/smit4082/genderstudies/2007/04/womanizing_advertisements_not.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 22:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
	<enclosure url="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/smit4082/genderstudies/Calvin%2BKlein%2BETERNITY%2B_A5_C3_AB_ED_A4k_AD_BB2.jpg" length="38966" type="image/jpeg" /><enclosure url="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/smit4082/genderstudies/eternity_cosmo_june_2002a.jpg" length="51516" type="image/jpeg" />
         <title>CK - wedding rings?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>After viewing a few of Calvin Klein's ads for perfume/cologne, I noticed something that remained constant in most of the photographs.</p>

<p><img alt="Calvin+Klein+ETERNITY+_A5_C3_AB_ED_A4k_AD_BB2.jpg" src="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/smit4082/genderstudies/Calvin%2BKlein%2BETERNITY%2B_A5_C3_AB_ED_A4k_AD_BB2.jpg" width="286" height="400" /></p>

<p><br />
<img alt="eternity_cosmo_june_2002a.jpg" src="http://blog.lib.umn.edu/smit4082/genderstudies/eternity_cosmo_june_2002a.jpg" width="334" height="474" /></p>

<p><br />
So, the first photograph features a beautiful, seemingly "natural" looking woman, topless, with wet hair on the beach somewhere.  When I looked at the picture, the first thing I noticed was her eyes.  I really didn't pay much attention to her left hand, where a wedding ring is strategically placed for the advertisement.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/smit4082/genderstudies/2007/03/ck_wedding_rings.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/smit4082/genderstudies/2007/03/ck_wedding_rings.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
	
         <title></title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I think it is sad how I can scroll through a listing of magazine ads and pick out exactly what gender the majority of the ads are going to focus on in order to attract the viewer's attention</p>

<p>For example:</p>

<p>Tool magazine ads: MEN<br />
Jewelry ads: WOMEN<br />
Electronic ads: MEN<br />
Makeup ads: WOMEN<br />
Car magazine ads: MEN<br />
Beer ads: WOMEN</p>

<p>You can't look at a single advertisement or watch a commercial advertising beer without a half-naked airbrushed fake baked skinny woman/en being featured.  WHY IS THIS?!</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/smit4082/genderstudies/2007/03/post.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/smit4082/genderstudies/2007/03/post.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
	
         <title>Mia vs Michael - Finally! Women Empowerment Ad</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>	In 1999, Element 79 Partners of Chicago were hired by The Gatorade Company to produce a commercial in which both male and female athletes are portrayed as 'equal'.  â€śMichael vs. Miaâ€? was the name of the commercial in which Mia Hamm, considered to be one of the greatest white female athletes of today, and Michael Jordan, a phenomenal, black basketball player, go through a round of different sports and battle one another.  While the commercial rolls, the song â€śAnything You Can Do- I Can Do Betterâ€? by Irving Berlin is playing in the background.<br />
	<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liKnJ-ejztw&mode=related&search=">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=liKnJ-ejztw&mode=related&search=</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/smit4082/genderstudies/2007/02/woman_empowerment_mia_vs_micha.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.lib.umn.edu/smit4082/genderstudies/2007/02/woman_empowerment_mia_vs_micha.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
