« October 2006 | Main | December 2006 »

November 25, 2006

My Thoughts on Technopoly

Whether you believe in creationism or evolution, the end result is the same…man is the worlds greatest living species. While one of the newer species, man has achieved the levels of thought, ability to communicate, use tools, and create that no other animal has been able to achieve. No creature on earth could possibly overtake and overthrow man from the thrown that he sits in…except man himself and the technologies that he creates. In this way, technology has become the alpha of the entire animal kingdom.

The movement of technology taking over the world has been a slow process, in terms of man’s time on earth, but has picked up the pace in recent decades. From the automated factories which no longer require human workers to produce goods, to cars that are parking and indeed perhaps soon driving themselves. These inventions are meant to be for the greater good of mankind, but all leading toward machines that think for themselves and humans being used only as an energy source living only in a dream world with a few “free� minds living in underground cities hiding from the ever-present hunting machines. If that day winds up happening, I think I might opt for the blue pill.


technopoly copy.JPG

November 11, 2006

What Came First, the Math or the Architecture ?

Just like with the chicken and the egg, it is impossible to say which came first between architecture and math. Back in prehistoric and early historic times, cavemen designed the environment. Not to the extent of today, but they still had to alter the environment to provide suitable dwellings…making fire-pits, altering rock arrangements, etc. While this is not Architecture, it is architecture in the simplest definition of the word (altering the built environment). At the same time, these same activities involved math. While I doubt that the cavemen were thinking in terms of numbers and angles, they had to deal with the implications of them in shape, weight, angles, etc. So it is impossible to say which came first, the math or the architecture.
Not knowing which came first does not change the fact that the two are forever linked, whether they like it or not. Architecture can not happen without math. One simply needs the elements of geometry, trigonometry, measurement, physics, etc. in order to construct anything. Louis Kahn’s National Assembly Building in Bangladesh is an excellent example of how Architecture is created with geometry. And math can not exist, or would not exist without architecture. There would be no need. While math is not always used to change or shape the built environment within the physical realm, math is dealing with the designed environment within some realm, physical, informational, or virtual realm. If it were not altering or understanding some designed environment, math just would not have a purpose.
Maybe which came first is not a good question. How about, why did architecture and mathematics cross the road?


Bangladesh - Dhaka National Assembly web groot.jpg