"Equivocation and Free Choice in _Macbeth_"
If you are interested in hearing more about equivocation in _Macbeth_, you may want to read this short essay.
More Essays on _Macbeth_
This website has quite a few links to essays of various topics on _Macbeth_.
With world enough and time, you might visit "Angels and Ministers of Grace: Theatrical Superstitions through the Ages" by Krsitin McDermott.
It places superstitions about productions of Macbeth in a larger theatrical context. Make of its slightly mystical conclusion what you will.
Use the comments to discuss your reaction to the production. Possible starting points:
What effects did the the all-male cast have?
What are the effects of having the Duke be so tentative, so bumbling? (This is not a standard reading of him).
What of Isabella, including the ending?
Angelo was almost laconic (also, unfortunately, too soft-spoken, as was Isabella at times). What seemed to be suggested by his tone and pacing?
What stage business (actions/interactions) surprised you, or were particularly effective or not?
What effects did the long, spare stage have? The music? The dancing?
For those of you intersted in the historical Richard, the Richard III Society is devoted to a reassessment of him as a historical figure, rather than a figure of legend, propaganda, and sheer dramatic villainy..