Having not been in Tunis, it's hard to see the WSIS as a resounding success. I'm sure that for the people who were there the networking and social factors are very meaningful. But, let's face it, the Internet governance matters are unchanged and the Digital Solidarity Fund remains unfunded.
The developed countries have defended their position concerning the Digital Solidarity Fund, stating that they prefer to rely on established programmes, like the World Bank's. Is this rational? In a certain sense one would have to say, "yes". There are many programmes that are well established, where valuable experience has been gained, and this should not be underestimated. On the other hand, giving the intended beneficiaries and their geographical and social neighbours a more prominent role in the direction of the programmes increases relevance. If the intention with the Digital Solidarity Fund is to promote this type of local responsibility and cooperation than surely it is justified.
Posted by thay0012 at November 19, 2005 09:06 AM