« China's Air Pollution: an international problem | Main | The current technologies of carbon capture and it's pros/cons. »

Ozone: Good Up High, Bad Nearby

uvrayjp.gif
Ozone is a pale blue, relatively unstable molecule made of three atoms of oxygen, represented with the chemical formula O3. It was first discovered by Christian Friedrich Schonbein, a German scientist, in 1893. Ozone molecules are angular, polar, and diamagnetic. The oxygen bond lengths are identical. Ozone is formed from molecular oxygen (O2) by ultraviolet and extreme ultraviolet photolysis and then recombination of atomic oxygen (O) with O2. It can also be formed by passing an electrical discharge through gaseous oxygen. Ozone has a unique odor that is often noticed during electrical storms and near electrical equipment.
Ozone can have vastly different effects depending on where ozone resides. At atmospheric heights of about 15 miles up, ozone acts as a shield to protect Earth’s surface from the sun’s harmful ultraviolet radiation. It this shield was not there, humans would be more vulnerable to skin cancer, cataracts, and impaired immune systems. In the air closer to Earth, that humans breathe, ozone is a harmful pollutant that can damage lung tissue and plants. Ozone is a major component of smog. Because ozone also reacts strongly with other molecules, it is dangerous to have large concentrations near the ground. Hot weather and strong sunlight cause ground-level ozone concentration levels to rise to hazardously high levels. Urban areas often have high levels of “bad� ozone.
About 90 percent of the Earth’s ozone is at higher altitudes, where it absorbs ultraviolet radiation. Wither out the shield in the stratosphere, the radiation would have an easy path to follow to strike Earth. The hole in the ozone layer is allowing this radiation a clearer shot at the Earth.
Ozone depletion occurs naturally over Antarctica because of the ice clouds formed during the winter. The ice clouds convert the chlorine to its atomic form. The air over Antarctica is the only place where it is cold enough for the reactions necessary to convert the ozone to oxygen due to the polar vortex formed by the cold polar winds. There is no hole above the North Pole because the average temperature is warmer than at the South Pole.
The polar winds keep the ozone surrounding the hole from filling in the hole, but if the winds are strong enough to keep the ozone out, why don’t they keep the hole from getting bigger? Any thoughts would be great. We hope to answer this in our next post.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/68995

Comments

A couple of thoughts-

there is depletion of ozone over the north pole, it is not as great as the south pole since the landscape is more uneven so that the polar vortex that forms each winter is not as strong, and hence allows more mixing with other air. This means that it doesn't get as cold, and that dispersion of O3 from outside the region can occur.

There is also ozone depletion over the rest of the planet, but it is much smaller (1 - 10% of the polar regions). Net effect is that more high energy radiation from the sun is observed everywhere. It is most pronounced at the poles.

Why do urban areas have higher levels of ozone than elsewhere? pretty much the same amount of sunlight hits urban areas as anywhere else so what's the difference? Is it just the increased amount of electrical equipment that you state can create ozone? I have my doubts because if ozone is a major component in smog wouldn't I see some smog forming around electrical equipment (maybe it does and I just haven't paid attention)? There must be something else going on, could you enlighten me?

The ground-level ozone is created by a chemical reaction with NOx and volatile organic compounds, VOCs, in the presence of sunlight. The motor vehicle exhaust and industrial emissions are common sources of the NOx and VOC to form the ground level ozone. Urban areas typically have lots of cars and industry to contribute to the ozone produced. The EPA links talk about "good" vs "bad" ozone and the proposed stronger smog standards.

http://epa.gov/groundlevelozone/
http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/eebfaebc1afd883d85257355005afd19/27000f081fd42325852573010045ce51!OpenDocument

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)