Main | February 2007 »

January 31, 2007

1312007

I really enjoyed reading Dillard’s “Heaven and Earth In Jest.� It was interesting to read for many reasons. One point Dillard made that I agreed with was her point about steers. She said, “They are all bred beef: beef heard, beef hide, beef hocks. They’re a human product like rayon. They’re like a field of shoes. You can’t see through to their brains as you can with other animals; they have beef fat behind their eyes, beef stew.� What this says to me is how overly domesticated we have made some animals. She talks about cattle in this example. We only see them strictly in a utilitarian viewpoint. What can we use them for? They come into this world only for food, at least in this country you do not have undomesticated cattle roaming freely. For some reason this makes me mad. We have come in and totally taken over. We see everything on this earth as something we already own and should be able to do freely with. I don’t think we should be able to do that, I’m not saying animals should have the same rights as humans, but it seems ridiculous that we should be able to enslave an entire species of animals. It’s not just cattle, we’ve done it to any kind of house pet and its even been done to humans. I’m just ranting again.

I also liked how she finished her writing. Towards the end she says, “I am the arrow shaft, carved along my length by unexpected lights and gashes from the very sky, and this book is the straying trail of blood.� This ties in with what she had previously said about the hunting practices of some Native Americans. By her writing this paper we can follow her views and eventually learn what she had been thinking when this was written.

History of Cattle Domestication

January 23, 2007

Why Woods?

I believe Thoreau choose the woods because they are one of many examples of Nature in its purest form. He could have chosen to live on a prairie if he lived in the Midwest or a desert if he lived in the Southwest. Regardless, the woods helped him to escape the daily grind of what was then modern life. Things have only gone down hill since the nineteenth century. Today our society is based entirely too much on productivity and routine. Maybe I’m just crazy, productivity is good, but I think we’ve taken it to insane levels. Maybe wandering off into the woods isn’t such a bad thing? It sounded like Thoreau was getting into a routine that he didn’t like and wasn’t enjoying life like he should have been.

Work.
Eat.
Sleep.

Routine can be a wicked thing. I can already feel myself falling into a routine and that terrifies me. Maybe I’m due for a trip into the woods of downtown Minneapolis, maybe not. Either way I can see why he chooses the woods. They helped him break off from society. The woods were a place were he could grow his own food and didn’t have to worry about the constraints of a job. He was able to be very sustainable if not completely sustainable. Which, I don’t know if you’ve noticed but in today’s world being completely sustainable is nearly impossible, not to mention downright expensive. If Thoreau wanted to take a hike or lounge around Walden Pond he could. Why? Because he had broken free from the constraints of the daily eight to five grind. The woods helped Thoreau see past the building materialism worth of his time. He could finally see himself and nature as one. Maybe, I just rambled and ranted for a page, I hope that made sense.

Check out this link, its about Transcententalism, a movement Thoreau was apart of with many other people of his time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendentalism

i don't think thats even a link, just copy paste it.