Here is another excellent critical review. It is a formal meta-analysis and is beyond the scope of what is expected for your project -- but there are many aspects of it that provide useful hints about how you might proceed with your own topic and critical review. It is available through the library e-journals. The authors are from the psychology department here at the U. The first author acknowledged support of an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship to do this work. (You might look into it!)
Kuncel, N.R., Hezlett, S.A., & Ones, D.S. (2001). A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the Graduate Record Examination: Implications for graduate student selection and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 162-181.
Here is an excellent outline / checklist, "The literature review: A few tips on conducting it" You can download a pdf from this site: http://www.writing.utoronto.ca/advice/specific-types-of-writing/literature-review. The authors (Dena Taylor & Margaet Procter, University of Toronto), make several particularly important points:
"...the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries."
Also - "A literature review is a piece of discursive prose, not a list describing or summarizing one piece of literature after another. It's usually a bad sign to see every paragraph beginning with the name of a researcher."
We will be adding more to this entry as materials are discovered. Please share with us what you have found, and we'll add them. Thanks to Heather for the Toronto piece above.