Frederick R. Weisman Art Museum
visiting
events calendar
exhibits
audio
collection
public art on campus
get involved
architecture & history
Weisman Expansion
Hindsight blog

Muse on participatory democracy and the roles of all citizens including students, artists, the media, and of course, politicians. Presented by the Weisman Art Museum with the exhibition "Hindsight is Always 20/20".

« October 2008 | Main | December 2008 »

November 22, 2008

The Need for a Developmental Leader

We have cast our votes and elected our political leaders for the next four years. Now as President-elect Obama is selecting his team, we are learning more about the team of people that we hope will lead us through this economic crisis (and all those other problems) into a more sustainable, just, and united future. For Obama to fulfill the promises he made during his campaign—especially by inspiring the hope that this can be a government of the people, by the people, for the people—he will need not just to pull together a team of strong leaders able to inspire vision and get things done, he will also need to bring together leaders that have the ability to grow and develop the American populace.

For a long time, we have learned to be complacent. We have been sucked into the black hole of television and the mass media where we become passive receptors of all that is thrown at us. We’ve learned that it’s easier to pay an expert to solve a problem than to solve a problem ourselves. If there is one thing we’ve been taught time and time again, it is that our politicians can and will solve our problems for us. We have been told over and over again that it is our civic responsibility to vote and that’s where our responsibility ends.

Now we face problems we’ve seen before and problems our parents could never have imagined. We are beyond a time when a strong, charismatic leader could pull us through. There are too many problems that are far too complex for any one person to solve. The solutions to these problems won’t come from the top-down. Obama recognized that and it is clear that he pulled together a campaign that involved an incredible number of people organized more powerfully than perhaps has ever been done before. It is going to have to be from those people, and all people, coming together and growing together if real change is to occur. Regulation alone won’t address the environmental, economic, and justice problems we now face. It will require us to reinvent ourselves in a 21st century world. And not just ourselves, but our businesses, institutions, and bureaucracies. The type of leadership we need now cannot just inspire us and it cannot muscle its way through these problems. It will need to develop us to adapt to these challenges that will not be solved otherwise. The leadership that will serve us best will need to help us reinvent ourselves and support us in doing so.

That leadership will also need to recognize that we learn slowly, but that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t invest in our learning. Change doesn’t happen quickly. It isn’t a light switch waiting to be turned on. Real change takes time, happens slowly, and comes only through the development and growth of an entire people. In short, Obama and his team will need to develop the American people into leaders ready to adapt to the challenges we will face in the coming years. Doing that will be no easy task and also will not be a singular one; it will be an ongoing process. But first, Obama has to stoke the fires that he ignited in so many people during that campaign.

November 20, 2008

Minnesota Pro Bowl

MN Pro Bowl photoResized.jpg
My grandson, Jack, after visiting the polls in 2006. He won't trash talk you - but he may need a diaper change.

After the November 4 election I’d planned to turn my blog posts more towards art and its evolving role in public affairs. I’d hoped to focus less on electoral politics, but here in Minnesota the election isn’t over. The Coleman/Franken recount has brought out the good, the bad, and the ugly in constituents on both sides. OK, maybe just the bad and the ugly. And it’s putting the lie to Minnesota Nice.

I should admit up front I never really believed in Minnesota Nice. I’ve always thought it was a provincial fable, a way to put a positive spin on passive aggressiveness – and a free pass when it comes to avoiding direct discussion of tough topics. I’ve also thought that ‘nice’ is overrated. How about we try for generous and compassionate? Or courteous, intelligent, and welcoming? Nice? I’ve always felt confident Minnesotans at their best are a lot more than just nice. But these days even humble ‘nice’ is in short supply.

The reader posts I’ve read on local news sites are awe-inspiring in their pure negativity and, too often, completely baseless allegations. How can so many know so little about something so widely reported? Where do these people find the time to spew so much venom? What fuels their paranoia? How do they muster such righteous aversion to simple facts? It’s as if they inhabit some strange, parallel universe where they’ve yet to discover the virtues of trust, patience, and common sense, not to mention nice. Here’s an actual Nov. 18th reader comment posted to a StarTribune website article on the recount:

"Al Franken is a whining, loud-mouthed, woman-demeaning, rape-promoting, porn-spewing, abortion-embracing, sick excuse of a comedian. It is time for him to pack up his bags and get out of Minnesota. For good. For the good of the State and the good of the country. His very presence in Minnesota creates an odor worse than the largest swine farm. It is time for a change... of Al Franken's diapers. Go home, Al, to Hollywood or to a large east coast city where your kind are embraced. You are a loser, even if you happen to have your big buck allies insert enough illegal votes to eke out a "win" over Coleman."

Swine farm? Diapers? Illegal votes? And what exactly does s/he mean by, “your kind?? I’ve used an anti-Franken post to illustrate my point, but I’ve seen plenty of Coleman trashing, too.

As the recount rolls on, Minnesota Nice is for chumps. The partisan posters are hell bent on winning the world championship in mudslinging and a Guinness World Record for baseless vitriol. They’ve created a whole new meaning for the term “gutter ball.?

Yes, here in Minnesota the election isn’t over. On Day Two of the Coleman/Franken recount things are already getting ugly and, well, pretty weird. And as the journalist Hunter S. Thompson once famously observed, “When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.?

November 4, 2008

Plumbing the Possibilities

Today I’m pondering the historic nature of the 2008 election. If recent polling is any indication Senator Barack Obama is about to become the first African-American president-elect of the United States.

As the campaigning comes to an ugly end, Senator Obama is being called un-American. His patriotism and love of country are being called into question by many who oppose his election, including none other than Joe the Plumber. I mean really. Are there people out there who find JTP a credible resource for their voting information? And since when did we time travel back to the 1950’s with all this talk about who is and who’s not un-American? It’s interesting to note that just as the country is poised to take a giant leap forward there are those who’d like to send it stumbling back to some pretty dark days.

So, to shake the dirt off on the morning of this groundbreaking election, I’d like to consider a couple of my favorite American upstarts, starting with Mark Twain.

How many of us were taught about Mark Twain’s anti-war activism? He spoke out when the U.S. went to war with Spain in 1898 and also against the Philippine-American War. Twain became one of the leading protesters against the war, and soon his patriotism was called into question. Sound familiar? But Twain had strong ideas about the true meaning of patriotism, writing in his novel A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court, “You see my kind of loyalty was loyalty to one’s country, not to its institutions or its officeholders. The country is the real thing, the substantial thing, the eternal thing; it is the thing to watch over and care for and be loyal to…? Twain felt no need to support Roosevelt and his wars; it was the United States and its people he felt loyal to.

JenWellstone.jpg
The late Senator Paul Wellstone with my daughter, Jen, on the right.

Another who would certainly be subject to scathing scrutiny in this current McCarthy-fueled flashback is our own homegrown, odds-buster, Paul Wellstone. I think about Wellstone and his original long-shot candidacy a lot these days. How his victory made change seem possible. Last night I got out my copy of Wellstone’s book, Conscience of a Liberal, and started skimming through it, re-visiting the parts I’d underlined when I read it just after the Paul’s death. I came upon a story he recalled about meeting a student from the University of Michigan who told him, “Senator, I want to be able to dream again – about a better country and a better world. And politics today doesn’t give me a chance to dream.?

The candidacy of Barack Obama has changed American forever, and for the better. We’ve glimpsed the future – and wherever that former student is, I’ll be s/he is dreaming now.

search

recent posts

Subscribe to this blog's feed
RSS 2.0
[What is this?]

Powered by
Movable Type 4.31-en