This site has links to the available software packages, books on the topic, etc. all nicely annotated.

What is Activity Theory?

Martin Ryder's Activity Theory page

Learning by Expanding: ten years after

And if Gawker was a kind of guilty pleasure people enjoyed after the horror of 9/11 had lingered just a little too long, it is a pleasure that has begun testing readers’ limits. A posting in August noted that a woman had been knocked down and killed crossing the street in front of an Urban Outfitters store: “You know we’re completely in favor of anything that suggests NYC is edgy,� wrote Gawker. “But we’d argue things have gone too far when shopping for ironic T-shirts becomes a potentially fatal extreme sport.�

The woman turned out to be an 86-year-old Holocaust survivor, which lead The New York Times to accuse Gawker of turning “everyday heartbreak� and “heinous� crimes into “inflection points for irony�.

Much as the outpouring of humour in New York in the 1920s that gave rise to the Algonquin Round Table was a temporary post-traumatic cultural reaction to the shock of the Great War, the Gawker spirit is wearing a little thin in light of a seemingly endless bloody insurgency in Iraq, a mesmerising failure of government to deal with the massive catastrophe of Hurricane Katrina, and revelations of corruption on Capitol Hill. “Satire,� said Choire Sicha, “is the most useless cultural effluvia one could possibly produce out of the cultural situation in America right now.�

I use: bloglines because it is free and I can track things across multiple computers easily. You can enter in feed URL's directly on the web interface, but I would recommend installing their bookmarklet so you can just subscribe with a click. I used to use the notifier that alerts you when new postings are made, but now I just keep a tab open in Safari or Firefox and refresh it when I have the chance to read.

Just in case you haven't discovered them, a couple of useful feeds for Rhetoric people are CCC Online, where an archive of previously published articles is being established, and Kairosnews, which often has CFPs and some job listings. There are many more, of course. If people are interested, we can always swap useful links here too.

As you remember, I'm sure, I talked mostly in class last night about my disappointment with people who challenge structuralist by oversimplifying the systematic positions they take. Those of you who know me, also, know that my undergraduate exposure to physical science makes me think that the resources of probability, computational mathematics, and more abstract algebras and calculii (is that the plural?) make a modern reinterpretation of some discredited structural opinions at least worthy of argument.

Anyway, my response isn't really about that. It's about expanding my model to allow for B. and about two of the several problems I have with his assertion.

No one included in the above group would wish to think of themselves as belonging to a “ school�—we are far too diverse a group--however, Sonny Hyon, a doctoral student of John Swales coined the term her 1996 article, “Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL� which appeared in TESOL Quarterly (pp. 693-722). Hyon had written a dissertation in which she compared the rhetorically-oriented genre analysts (e.g. Miller 1984; Bazerman, 1988; Devitt, 19 91; Myers, 1990; Berkenkotter and Huckin, 1995, Smart, 19xx, Freedman & Medway, 1994, etc.). Carolyn Miller’s 1984 article, “Genre as social action� in the Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70: 151-176, was seminal (germinal!) in being the uber text for the flurry of articles that followed by the above authors (I’ll bring copies of Miller, 1984 to class next week, but would encourage you to get it on your own as an “introduction� to the Genre Knowledge book.
The rhetorically-oriented NAGS was compared by Hyon to the genre analysts who mostly were applied linguists by training, and were interested in the pedagogical implications of academic genres for ESL and ESP training. This second group included John Swales, Vijay Bhatia, Ann Johns, Tony Dudley Evans, John Flowerdew, and Brian Paltridge. A third group of genre analysts—according to Hyon—were the Australian functional systemic linguists (FSP), trained by Michael Halliday to think about genre in relation to “registers� of different disciplinary spheres. This group of linguists were interested in direct applications of disciplinary genres as the basis of language learning, especially when it came to the language training of non-native speakers in elementary schools. This group included Gunter Kress (who has since moved away from Halliday’s views), J.R. Martin, Francis Christie, Paul Thiebault, and a group of linguists at the University of Sidney, who thought it would be possible to design an entire elementary school genre-based curriculum in which scientific genres would be as much a part of the curriculum and instruction as the narrative and personal experience genres that language arts teachers usually teach

Hyon’s categories have stuck; and genre theory (outside of literary theory) is commonly divided into the above three camps--; however, in actuality there is considerable overlap, since no researcher or theorist ever stays in the same place, and many who have been categorized as being in one group or the other have moved on to new interests, and new issues and problems which call for new approaches to genre studies. One of the most important of these is, I believe, the issue of multimodality. Most Americans are shifting from a print-based form of learning to alternative modes that include a semiotic array including graphics and visuals, streaming video, three dimensional objects in virtual reality, and interactive oral and written forms of communication. Thus genre theorists will have to develop new vocabularies and new tools for understanding and describing these emerging communicative forms. Cristina’s presentation last night hinted at this new vocabulary and new tools for analysis. . .

After you have logged in, you are sent to the main page of the publishing platform Movable Type. In order to make an entry to the blog, click the blue box that says: “create a new entry on this weblog.� This box is next to the blog title. (Don’t click “create a new weblog� to make an entry.)

If you want to comment on someone’s entry, you can do this right from the blog homepage; you don’t have to login.