vuexx211: April 2012 Archives

Less is More

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes

Week 7 Response
(Response to Jhon's post on Role of TV on Child Development)

Technology is affecting children. There is no question about it, there are currently 285 million televisions in US households, based on information from the Consumer Electronics Association (CEA). There is no doubt that children learn behavior from what they see such as siblings and parents, but their interpretation of these behavior are also based on what they see. Children's behavior is just as likely to come from watching tv and playing games as it is to come from seeing real people in their lives perform actions. This is one of the major concerns of parents as they allow their children to watch tv and surf the net no matter the age. Children are easily influenced and they don't have a firm grasp on what is what, so when they see that men are portrayed as masculine and show little emotion they think that all men are like that. Or when women are shown as weak and fragile they take that image and just run with it. I think that by allowing children to see these images we as adults are encouraging the stereotype that everyone falls into one of the two categories and that what they see on television is true.
stereotype.gif
In my opinion I think that children are better off not growing up with these prejudices toward how they should act. Children should be allowed to make their own judgement about how they view others. I think this is more of a concern when it comes to tv than it does in video games because even when the television show goes to commercial, the commercial uses even more stereotyping to sell their products. Less exposure would be better for children than more even if the television programs are educational. I would say as parents, adults have the power to choose when their children watch and they should use that ability to benefit their children's development.

Liar Liar Pants on Fire!

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes

In the television show "Lie to Me" psychologist Dr. Cal Lightman has the ability to determine when a person is lying based on nonverbal ques. One look at me and he would know exactly when I am lying because I am the worst liar to mankind. Research might say something different though. Paul Ekman evaluated professions on their ability to detect deception. Secret service agents and clinical judges were among the best at locating deception. Even they wouldn't be accurate 100% of the time.
The show's portrayal of lie detection may be entertaining, but it just doesn't seem plausible to happen. This is because there are other factors that influence a person to express nonverbal signs that would seem familiar to lying. This was one of the questions that I always had watching CSI or criminal shows use lie detectors. What if there are other causes that lead a person to express the "symptoms" of lying. I was correct! Researchers have considered this alternative, and the lie detector test is not a viable source of evidence in court.
lie-detect.jpg
My question to the audience is has anyone ever either administer a lie detector test or taken it? And also how easily does lying come to people or to people you know? What makes a good liar?

About this Archive

This page is an archive of recent entries written by vuexx211 in April 2012.

vuexx211: February 2012 is the previous archive.

vuexx211: May 2012 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.