Traditional Vs. Digital Research: Does 'New' Mean Better?

| No Comments

trad research.jpgAfter my group's In the News presentation (Los Cincos), I started writing a list of pros and cons, to see if digital research is really better than traditional research. Here is what I came up with:


-qualitative focus groups--enables sharing, building,
-in depth interviews---face-to-face, more personal, understanding individuals
-allows moderator to ask questions based off the responses of the participant.
-we can trust the results of traditional methods because they have proven to work
-gain insight by examining a participant's body language

-time consuming
-finding and recruiting a specific sample takes energy


-can reach a wider geographic target, even across cultures
-anonymity of online world can encourage participation
-digital media provides an almost instant sample
-visual aids or sound clips are easy to use during surveys or focus groups
-cheap and time efficient

-understanding and interpreting text is difficult
-can't ask questions as a follow-up to a participant's response


Digital methods can benefit the traditional research world and vice versa. Digital methods can not be ignored because that is where the participants are found these days---online. Participants prefer to be reached by email, social media, or texts. We need to incorporate basic fundamentals from traditional research to insure digital research is effective.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by wolfx450 published on December 5, 2012 2:59 PM.

Snowball Sampling: Good or Bad? was the previous entry in this blog.

Impulsive College Women at Greater Risk for Alcohol Problems is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.